MARIAM MANUKYAN

Master of Law,

Member of the RA Chamber of Advocates, Advocate

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-35

 Annotation.

Within the framework of scientific research, it was studied whether the discretion of the RA Civil Appellate Court is absolute in the selection of powers, if, taking into account the factual circumstances of the case, it is possible (there is a legal possibility) to choose specific powers, and also the RA Civil Appellate Court should not have a legal obligation to motivate/justify the choice of any of their powers, or does the RA Civil Court of Appeal currently have such a legal obligation? The relevance of the research is determined by the developing legal practice (the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 18.03.22 within the framework of the civil case No. SND/0050/02/20 and the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 31.10.22 in the civil case No. ED/19766/02/18) and the Court of Appeal with the diversity of powers and the complexity of their content.

The main goals of this work are:

• as a result of the legal analysis, highlight the criteria for the selection of powers of the RA Court of Appeals and their peculiarities,

• Conduct a legal analysis, identifying the duty of the Court of Appeals to justify its choice of authority, on the basis of which the judicial act will be subject to appeal.

• Presentation of broad and narrow interpretations of specific articles of RA Legislation, their identification and justification.

• Raising and justifying comments aimed at overcoming legal uncertainty,

• Submission of recommendations aimed at securing the rights of a person to a case investigation and a fair trial within a reasonable period of time.

Problems of the scientific paper answered the following questions:

1. Is the discretion of the Court of Appeals of the Republic of Armenia absolute in the matter of the selection of powers defined by the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia, in the event that a specific power may be applied (there is a legal possibility) in the context of the factual circumstances of the case?

2. Shouldn’t the RA Court of Appeals have a legislative duty to justify the choice of its powers to be exercised as a result of the examination of the appeal filed against the judgment defined by the RA Civil Procedure Code and/or does the RA Court of Appeals not currently have such a legislative duty?

PDF

HERBERT HARUTYUNYAN

PhD Student at the Chair of Constitutional Law of Yerevan State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-20

Annotation.

The work is dedicated to the powers of the President of the Republic of Armenia and issues of constitutional responsibility in the context of the 2015 constitutional amendments. Historical and comparative legal analysis presents the evolution of the constitutional institution of the president in the Republic of Armenia, examines the demands presented to the presidential candidate, the powers of the head of the state and the structures of their implementation according to the Constitution adopted in 1995, then the constitutional amendments of 2005 and 2015. The issues of positive and negative constitutional responsibility of the presidents of RA and other states, the grounds and procedure for the dismissal of the president are also a subject of study. It is noted that it is a primary task for the President of the Republic of Armenia to observe the observance of the Constitution, as this duty derives from the constitutional position of the head of the state. The head of state is the highest official who carries out the highest representation of the state both in domestic and international relations. ensures the continuity of state institutions, acts as the guarantor of the constitutional order, integrity and independence of the state. The analysis of the international constitutional practice proves that the head of the state can occupy a different place in the system of state power. In a number of countries, the institution of the head of state is not provided in any branch of the state power, or it is provided in the legislative and executive powers at the same time, or only in the executive power. In the Republic of Armenia, the institution of the head of the state is under development due to changes in the form of government formed as a result of constitutional changes in the country.

PDF

NAREK HARUTYUNYAN

Applicant of YSU Criminal Law Chair,

Investigator of the 1st Investigation Division of Kentron and Nork-Marash

Administrative Districts of the Investigation Department of Yerevan

City of the RA Investigative Committee, 2rd Class Counselo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-10

Annotation.

The article discusses issues related to the essence, types and main forms of manifestation of one of the common phenomena in the modern world - migration. It is noted that in general, migration is understood as the forced or voluntary movement of the population from one country to another or within one country, due to a change in permanent or temporary place of residence. In this regard, it is explained that migration is a large-scale and multifaceted phenomenon, and the classification of its components is carried out according to various criteria (for example: geographical, functional, temporary, legal, etc.). Within the framework of the study, special attention is also paid to the dynamics of the annual number of departures from the Republic of Armenia and entries into the Republic of Armenia. In this regard, it is noted that the overall migration to the Republic of Armenia in 2015-2019 is constantly increasing. Meanwhile, in 2020 a sharp decline in this indicator is recorded. Later it grows back. The author also draws special attention to the fact that for RA citizens the difference between entries and exits is, as a rule, negative, and for foreigners it is positive. The exception is 2020, which is mainly due to restrictions caused by COVID-19.

PDF

ARMEN SHUKURYAN

Deputy Head of the RA United Social Service,

Senior Researcher at the Institute of Philosophy,

Sociology and Law of the NAS of the RA,

Doctoral Student, Candidate of Law, Associate Professor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-3

Annotation.

The article thoroughly discusses the essence, concept and substantive features of the legalistic (positivist) concept of law. In the article, the author argues that the basis of the legalistic (positivist) concept of law is a combination of law as an order, as mandatory definitions of the state, and decrees. According to that concept, right and law are effectively identical because they express the sovereign will of the state. The history and theory of legal thought and jurisprudence are penetrated by the struggle of two opposite types of legal understanding. These two types of interpretation of the understanding of law and understanding of law can be conditionally called juridical and legalistic types of legal understanding. Within these two types of legal understanding, there are different concepts of the understanding of law and directions of interpretation. Accounting for the intra-typological features of the inter-typological differences of one or another teaching about law is essential for the specific characterization of their theoretical-legal content.

PDF

Ամսագրի ամբողջական համարը

 

1. Արմեն Շուքուրյան - «Լեգիստական իրավահասկացություն», 

2. Նարեկ Հարությունյան - «Բնակչության միգրացիայի էության, տեսակների և դրսևորման ձևերի մասին»,

3. Հերբերտ Հարությունյան - «Պետության գլխի սահմանադրական պատասխանատվության հիմնահարցերը սահմանադրական բարեփոխումների համատեքստում»,

4. Մանե Կարապետյան - «Աշխատանքային պայմանագրի լուծումն աշխատողի նախաձեռնությամբ»,

5. Մարիամ Մանուկյան - «ՀՀ վերաքննիչ քաղաքացիական դատարանի հայեցողությունն իր լիազորությունները կիրառելիս մաս 1. «Ընդհանուր նկարագիր, հայեցողության շրջանակները և դրա առանձնահատկությունները»»,

6. Մերի Խաչատրյան - «Ապօրինի ծագում ունեցող գույքի բռնագանձման հայց հարուցելու հիմքերի ուսումնասիրությունը հաշտության համաձայնությամբ ավարտելը»,

7. Գևորգ Իսրայելյան - «Հանցավորությունը պայմանավորող իրավական բնույթի գործոնները և դրանց կանխարգելման արդի միջոցները Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում»,

8. Արմեն Ասատրյան - «Միգրանտի պատասխանատվության քրեաիրավական հիմքերը և իրավակիրառ պրակտիկան»,

9. Ռոզա Աբրահամյան - «Պատիժների կատարման տարբերակման և անհատականացման սկզբունքների երաշխիքների հիմնահարցը իրավական կարգավորման կառուցակարգի համատեքստում»,

10. Ադելինա Սարգսյան - «Ախտորոշիչ յատրոգենիաները յատրոգեն հանցագործությունների համակարգում»,

11. Ованес Баяндурян - ՛՛Право юридического лица хранить молчание: сравнительно-правовой анализ՛՛,

12. Ինգա Ավագյան - «Ապացույցների գնահատումը եզրափակիչ դատական ակտ կայացնելիս»,

13. Сурен Багинян - ՛՛Типичные следственные ситуации при расследовании государственной измены՛՛.

GOR HOVHANNISYAN

Associate Professor at the Chair of German and European Constitutional and

Administrative Law, as well as International Law at the University of Hagen,

Attorney-at-law, Мember of the Saxon Bar Association,

Doctor of Law (Berlin), Master of Administrative Sciences (Speyer)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-177

Annotation.

The first part of the four-part series of articles on European law starts with basic questions and the foundations of organizational law. The second part explains the legal sources of the European Union law and also deals with the legislative procedures. In addition, the structural principles applicable in the European law are outlined. The third part focuses on the fundamental rights of the European Union, which - in addition to the fundamental freedoms - are the essential individual rights of European primary law. The structural peculiarities from the perspective of the European and constitutional law are described, with a particular focus on the binding effect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights for the Member States. The fourth part explains the fundamental freedoms as the central means for establishing the internal market.

PDF

Այլ հոդվածներ …