MARIAM MANUKYAN

Master of Law,

Member of the RA Chamber of Advocates, Advocate

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.4-6-30

Annotation.

Within the framework of scientific research, an attempt is made to determine the existing criteria for assessing whether the judicial acts of the lower court are incomplete or unfounded or justified, and to propose new criteria that will be more targeted/relevant in each specific case.

And also in this context, to present the scope of discretion of the RA Civil Court of Appeal (hereinafter also the Court of Appeal) in the matter of choosing its powers and answer the following question: does the Court of Appeal have legislative duties and/or should not have them in terms of justifying the choice of its own powers.

The main goals of this work are:

• As a result of a systematic analysis, to identify the criteria for choosing the powers of the RA Court of Appeal and their features,

• Conduct a legal analysis by defining the existing criteria for assessing whether the judicial acts of the lower court are incomplete or improperly substantiated or justified.

• Propose new criteria for assessing whether the judicial acts of the lower court are incomplete or unfounded or justified, which would be more targeted/relevant in each specific case.

• Presentation of broad and narrow interpretations of specific articles of the RA legislation, their disclosure and justification.

• Identification and justification of comments aimed at overcoming legal uncertainty.

Problems of the scientific paper answered the following questions:

1. What are the existing criteria for assessing whether the judicial acts of the lower court are incomplete or unfounded or justified? Are the existing criteria sufficient for such an assessment.

2. Is the discretion of the Court of Appeals of the Republic of Armenia absolute in the matter of the selection of powers defined by the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia, in the event that a specific power may be applied (there is a legal possibility) in the context of the factual circumstances of the case?

3. Shouldn’t the RA Court of Appeals have a legislative duty to justify the choice of its powers to be exercised as a result of the examination of the appeal filed against the judgment defined by the RA Civil Procedure Code and/or does the RA Court of Appeals not currently have such a legislative duty?

PDF

RAFIK KHANDANYAN

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Theory of Law and Constitutional

Law of the Russian-Armenian University,

Judge of the Administrative Court of Appeal of the Republic of Armenia,

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor,

Doctoral Student at the Russian-Armenian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.4-6-10

Annotation.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms of normative regulation in the Republic of Armenia, focusing on various types of legal acts, including municipal agreements, job position descriptions in the civil service, and international agreements. The authors delve into the procedures for approval and ratification of these documents, their compliance with national legislation, as well as their impact on judicial practice and mechanisms of judicial control.

Special attention is paid to aspects of legal regulation in the context of local self-government, as well as the protection of rights and interests of citizens, organizations, and the state. The aim of the article is to identify key nuances of normative regulation and judicial control in the Armenian legal space, as well as to discuss challenges and prospects for the development of the legal system in the country. Employing an analytical approach and drawing on current legislation and relevant judicial decisions, the authors seek to provide readers with a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the issues under consideration, while emphasizing the significance of legal acts in contemporary Armenian legal practice.

PDF

MILA HAYRAPETOVA

Leading specialist of the Expert-Analytical Department of the

Legal Advisory Department of the RA Constitutional Court,

3rd year PhD student at the Armenian-Russian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.4-6-3

Annotation.

Regarding the realization of the right to proper administration established by the RA Constitution, the establishment of such principles and ensuring their practical applicability have become problematic today, which would really guarantee the right of the non-governmental party to proper administration in the administrative process carried out by the administrative body endowed with public authority. This article is devoted to the need for the applicability of such a principle as the principle of uniform application and interpretation of law, which is not specified in the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Basics of Administration and Administrative Procedure”. The article presents the factors that have an impact in administrative and legal activities to ensure the functioning of this principle. The principle of interpretation of the right of the non-governmental interested party was also derived from the mentioned principle, and an attempt was made to justify their general auxiliary effect in the implementation of proper administration. The aspects of the above-mentioned principle were also presented, that is, the proper implementation of administration by public authorities, the implementation of quality and efficient activities in favor of the welfare of the person, the public and the state, and the perception of the public’s legal culture and legal literacy, the level of legal perception, the presence of which contributes to higher quality law-making and law-enforcement activities.

PDF

Ամսագրի ամբողջական համարը

1. Միլա Հայրապետովա - «Իրավունքի միատեսակ կիրառման և մեկնաբանման սկզբունքի օժանդակ ազդեցությունը պատշաճ վարչարարության սահմանադրական իրավունքի իրացման հարցում», 

2. Ռաֆիկ Խանդանյան - «Ուղղակի դատական վերահսկողության օբյեկտների ընդլայնման միտումերը ՀՀ վարչական դատավարությունում»,

3. Մարիամ Մանուկյան - «ՀՀ վերաքննիչ քաղաքացիական դատարանի հայեցողությունն իր լիազորությունները կիրառելիս մաս 2. «Ստորադաս դատարանի դատական ակտերի թերի կամ սխալ պատճառաբանված կամ հիմավորված լինելու գնահատման առանձնահատկություններն ու չափանիշները»»,

4. Գևորգ Իսրայելյան - «Համակարգչային հափշտակության ընդհանուր զոհաբանական կանխարգելման արդի խնդիրները Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում»,

5. Ադելինա Սարգսյան, Անուշ Հակոբյան - «Յատրոգեն հանցագործությունների սուբյեկտիվ կողմի որոշ առանձնահատկություններ»,

6. Հռիփսիմե Խաչատրյան - «Դաստիարակչական բնույթի հարկադրանքի միջոցները Հայաստանի Հանրապետության նախկին և նոր քրեական օրենսգրքերի համատեքստում (համեմատաիրավական վերլուծություն)»,

7. Наира Зограбян - ՛՛Современные подходы к определению конкуренции уголовно-правовых норм՛՛, 

8. Սուրեն Բաղինյան - «Փաստաթղթերի քննչական զննության առանձնահատկությունները պետական դավաճանության գործերով քրեական վարույթների քննության ընթացքում»,

9. Гайк Григорян - ՛՛Проблемы правового регулирования некоторых правовых институтов после ратификации и вступления в силу статута международоного уголовного суда в Республике Армения՛՛,

10. Siranush Grigoryan - ՛՛The Future of EU Sanctions. Effectiveness, Challenges and Considerations՛՛.