RAFIK KHANDANYAN

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Theory of Law and Constitutional

Law of the Russian-Armenian University,

Judge of the Administrative Court of Appeal of the Republic of Armenia,

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor,

Doctoral Student at the Russian-Armenian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.4-6-10

 

Annotation.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms of normative regulation in the Republic of Armenia, focusing on various types of legal acts, including municipal agreements, job position descriptions in the civil service, and international agreements. The authors delve into the procedures for approval and ratification of these documents, their compliance with national legislation, as well as their impact on judicial practice and mechanisms of judicial control.

Special attention is paid to aspects of legal regulation in the context of local self-government, as well as the protection of rights and interests of citizens, organizations, and the state. The aim of the article is to identify key nuances of normative regulation and judicial control in the Armenian legal space, as well as to discuss challenges and prospects for the development of the legal system in the country. Employing an analytical approach and drawing on current legislation and relevant judicial decisions, the authors seek to provide readers with a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the issues under consideration, while emphasizing the significance of legal acts in contemporary Armenian legal practice.

PDF

MILA HAYRAPETOVA

Leading specialist of the Expert-Analytical Department of the

Legal Advisory Department of the RA Constitutional Court,

3rd year PhD student at the Armenian-Russian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.4-6-3

 

Annotation.

Regarding the realization of the right to proper administration established by the RA Constitution, the establishment of such principles and ensuring their practical applicability have become problematic today, which would really guarantee the right of the non-governmental party to proper administration in the administrative process carried out by the administrative body endowed with public authority. This article is devoted to the need for the applicability of such a principle as the principle of uniform application and interpretation of law, which is not specified in the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Basics of Administration and Administrative Procedure”. The article presents the factors that have an impact in administrative and legal activities to ensure the functioning of this principle. The principle of interpretation of the right of the non-governmental interested party was also derived from the mentioned principle, and an attempt was made to justify their general auxiliary effect in the implementation of proper administration. The aspects of the above-mentioned principle were also presented, that is, the proper implementation of administration by public authorities, the implementation of quality and efficient activities in favor of the welfare of the person, the public and the state, and the perception of the public’s legal culture and legal literacy, the level of legal perception, the presence of which contributes to higher quality law-making and law-enforcement activities.

PDF

 

Ամսագրի ամբողջական համարը

1. Միլա Հայրապետովա - «Իրավունքի միատեսակ կիրառման և մեկնաբանման սկզբունքի օժանդակ ազդեցությունը պատշաճ վարչարարության սահմանադրական իրավունքի իրացման հարցում», 

2. Ռաֆիկ Խանդանյան - «Ուղղակի դատական վերահսկողության օբյեկտների ընդլայնման միտումերը ՀՀ վարչական դատավարությունում»,

3. Մարիամ Մանուկյան - «ՀՀ վերաքննիչ քաղաքացիական դատարանի հայեցողությունն իր լիազորությունները կիրառելիս մաս 2. «Ստորադաս դատարանի դատական ակտերի թերի կամ սխալ պատճառաբանված կամ հիմավորված լինելու գնահատման առանձնահատկություններն ու չափանիշները»»,

4. Գևորգ Իսրայելյան - «Համակարգչային հափշտակության ընդհանուր զոհաբանական կանխարգելման արդի խնդիրները Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում»,

5. Ադելինա Սարգսյան, Անուշ Հակոբյան - «Յատրոգեն հանցագործությունների սուբյեկտիվ կողմի որոշ առանձնահատկություններ»,

6. Հռիփսիմե Խաչատրյան - «Դաստիարակչական բնույթի հարկադրանքի միջոցները Հայաստանի Հանրապետության նախկին և նոր քրեական օրենսգրքերի համատեքստում (համեմատաիրավական վերլուծություն)»,

7. Наира Зограбян - ՛՛Современные подходы к определению конкуренции уголовно-правовых норм՛՛, 

8. Սուրեն Բաղինյան - «Փաստաթղթերի քննչական զննության առանձնահատկությունները պետական դավաճանության գործերով քրեական վարույթների քննության ընթացքում»,

9. Гайк Григорян - ՛՛Проблемы правового регулирования некоторых правовых институтов после ратификации и вступления в силу статута международоного уголовного суда в Республике Армения՛՛,

10. Siranush Grigoryan - ՛՛The Future of EU Sanctions. Effectiveness, Challenges and Considerations՛՛.

 

SUREN BAGHINYAN

PhD student of the Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics

Department of Yerevan State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-129

 

Annotation.

This scientific article is devoted to the forensic science aspects of the investigation of high treason, particularly - model investigating situations typical to such kind of cases. At first the content of the investigating situation concept is touched by the author, different specialists’ approaches to that concept are introduced and analyzed, thenrelying on that- the author detects situations typical to the investigation of high treason-emphasizing the characteristics of their formation. By analyzing different specialists’ approaches in professional literature, the author shows the role of high technologies in the process of formation of investigating situations of such type of cases. The author emphasizes the work of bodies executing operative-search activity - in the scope of this matter- by justifying the importance of organizing operative monitoring in the process of investigation and detection of such type of cases. At the end of this article, the author’s conclusions are presented based on the results of the research.

PDF

INGA AVAGYAN

‘‘Private Legal Center’’ Law Firm, Founding Director, Advocate,

Claimant at Gladzor University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-116

Annotation.

Proving is one of the fundamental institutions of the science of criminal procedure and criminal procedural legislation. The process of proving as a complex type of cognitive and creative activity of law enforcement agencies consists of collecting, securing, checking and evaluating evidence in order to establish the circumstances to be established in a criminal case. The institution of evidence and the law of evidence in general received further development and improvement in the new Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia (adopted on June 30, 2021, came into force on July 1, 2022). In the article, the author examines current issues of assessing evidence in the final judicial act. Evaluation of evidence, as an element of the process of proof, is a mental, logical activity, as a result of which the court makes a conclusion about the admissibility, relevance, reliability of each of the pieces of evidence, and the sufficiency of the combination of evidence to reveal the circumstances entering into the subject of proof. In the final judicial acts, the courts are obliged to refer separately to the evidence available in the criminal proceedings and examined during the main proceedings, giving them separate evaluations, and based on the systematic analysis of the examined evidence and the perspective of their integrity, to consider the accusation presented to the accused justified, or to recognize the latter as not guilty. . Courts in their final judicial acts are obliged to fix and evaluate the evidence on which the court’s conclusions are based in terms of admissibility, relevancy and credibility, as well as specify the arguments for considering this or that evidence unreliable. Otherwise, the evaluation of the evidence, as a result of which the formation of the relevant internal conviction of the courts will be subjective in nature, will lead to arbitrariness and the violation of the right of a person to a fair trial, limiting the possibilities of the superior courts to check the legality and justification of the judicial act.

PDF

HOVHANNES BAYANDURYAN

Member of the Chamber of Advocates of the RA,

PhD Student at the Chair of Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure

Law of the RAU Institute of Law and Politics

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2024.1-3-104

Annotation.

The article discusses theoretical and practical problems of implementing one of the most important principles of criminal procedural law - the principle of the prohibition of self-incrimination through the implementation of the right to silence. The relevance of the topic is due to the reform of the criminal procedural legislation of various countries, including the Republic of Armenia, which provides for a special procedure for criminal proceedings against legal entities due to the reorganization of criminal procedural legal relations. The author clarifies some legal issues about the right to silence of a legal entity as an accused, and conducts a comparative legal analysis of various legislations and judicial practice of foreign countries.

PDF

Այլ հոդվածներ …