ADELINA SARGSYAN

PhD in Law,

Lecturer of the Department of Criminal Law and

Criminal Procedure Law,

Institute of Law and Politics of the Russian-Armenian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-13

Annotation.

This article examines the issues of current legal education through the prism of the ongoing processes of digital transformation. It is noted that legal education lags far behind digital needs and realities. In the light of the above, the author outlines the main directions for the development and improvement of legal education in order to train qualitatively new personnel, whose professional knowledge and skills will meet the current needs to the highest degree. The possibility of providing universities with appropriate highly specialized departments that train relevant personnel in the field of digital law is analyzed. The study of the experience of various universities suggests the need to revise the curricula of bachelor's and master's degrees with their subsequent adaptation to the ongoing processes of digitalization, namely, the provision of a number of disciplines related to the legal regulation of digital relations. Proposals are being made aimed at making changes to professional competencies, in particular, providing for such digital competence (subcompetence) as the ability to correctly apply the norms of substantive and procedural law in the field of digital rights of citizens.

PDF

 RAFAYEL VARDANYAN

Candidate of Law

ARMEN SHUKURYAN

Senior researcher at the Institute of Philosophy,

Sociology and Law of the NAS of the RA,

Candidate of Law

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-3

Annotation.

In this article the author has systematically analyzed the problems related to the origin and development of comparative jurisprudence in specific countries, in particular the origin and development of the idea of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world, the development of the views of comparative jurisprudence in the Middle Ages, the historical-philosophical aspects of comparative jurisprudence direction In Germany, the development of comparative jurisprudence in England and the USA, comparative jurisprudence in Russia, comparative jurisprudence in the first half of the 20th century, comparative jurisprudence in the period after World War 2, comparative jurisprudence and international scientific cooperation. The ideas of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world were more prominently manifested in the works of the philosophers of Ancient Athens and the lawyers of Ancient Rome, according to Western scholars, it was here that not only comparative-legal ideas were formed for the first time but also, in practice for the first time, an attempt was made to subject the state and law to comparative research. In the Middle Ages, the ideas of comparative jurisprudence had a certain development based on the borrowing (reception) of Roman law, the formation and coordination of canon law, as well as national legal system (mainly) on the basis of customary law. Comparative legal studies continued throughout the Middle Ages, up to modern times, when Montesquieu, Hugo Grotius, Pufendorf, and others succeeded one another. In the new and modern period, comperative legal researches not only multiplied in therms of volume, but also took on a systematic nature and was gradually formed as an independent legal science.

PDF