ANNA HAKOBYAN

Candidate of legal sciences,

Lecturer at the Institute of Law and International

Relations of Yerevan «Haybusak» University,

Assistant to Judge in the Civil Court of Appeal of the RA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-47

Annotation.

The scientific article presents the essence and content of the institution of acquisitive prescription, the historical preconditions of its formation and the reasons for its subsequent change. The subject of special discussion is the condition of good faith, which is interpreted as a subjective attitude towards the property (characteristic of treating the property with care of the owner). The article excludes the perception of the concept of good faith as possession of property on a legal basis, as it is accepted in the law enforcement practice of the country. At the same time, it is especially emphasized that possession should not be based on any legal basis, in other words, it is presented that the institution of acquisitive prescription is applicable in the case of illegal possession. In addition, reference is made to the period of acquisitive prescription, which is proposed to begin from the moment when the registered owner became aware of illegal possession or from the moment when the owner definitely could or should have known about such possession, because it is decisive for establishing the fact of indifference shown by the owner. Moreover, as a result of the study, it is concluded that from the moment of reaching the conditions of acquisitive prescription established by law, it is the actual possessor who bears the risk of losing his right to become the owner (to recognize it in a judicial way and submit to registration), as a person in a disadvantageous position compared to the registered owner (old or new).

PDF

YEPREM KARAPETYAN

Head of the Division for Drafting of the

Anti-Corruption Policy of the

Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia,

Applicant at the Public Administration Academy of the Republic of Armenia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-39

Annotation.

The study of the concept of integrity in the scope of public service is essential from the point of view of the anti-corruption reforms implemented in the RA legal system, in order to ensure their coordination, to provide the theoretical basis of the implemented changes and to clarify the framework of the integrity system. This is even more important from the point of view that there are few studies on integrity in domestic doctrinal sources, and the concept of integrity is not revealed in its full content. In this context, legislative regulations are a novelty in the Armenian reality and there is a need to ensure clarity at the legislative level as well. Based on the above, the description given in the international documents regarding the term of integrity has been highlighted within the framework of this article. At the same time, the main elements of the content of integrity, which were revealed in the works of a number of theorists, were studied. Summarizing the above-mentioned approaches, within the framework of this article, the concept of public integrity at the legislative level is proposed with the appropriate formulation. At the same time, the study of integrity system, the scope of which is fixed by the "Public Service" law, clearly shows that it needs some revision. In particular, within the framework of the above-mentioned law, the declaration institution is presented separately from the integrity system, while it is clear from the purpose of the declaration institution that it should be included under the integrity system. In addition, it is recommended to consider the restrictions on the acceptance of gifts connected with the implementation of official duties as a separate element of the integrity systen, separating it from the rules of conduct.

PDF

 

RAFIK KHANDANYAN

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Theory of Law and Constitutional

Law of the Russian-Armenian University,

Judge of the Administrative Court of Appeal of the Republic of Armenia,

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor,

Doctoral student of the Russian-Armenian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-26

Annotation.

The author conducts a comprehensive analysis of judicial practice and doctrinal approaches to defining the concepts of "object" and "subject" of judicial control in the administrative proceedings of the Republic of Armenia. The article highlights the problems and ambiguities in the use of these terms by the courts of Armenia and proposes ways to clarify and unify them to ensure consistency and clarity in judicial decisions. The author identifies two main groups of approaches to distinguishing the object and subject of judicial control in relation to normative legal acts in administrative proceedings. According to the first group, the object and subject of judicial control are considered equivalent concepts, but the preference is given to the formulation "subject of judicial control." The second group of authors seeks to clearly differentiate these concepts, where the object of control is considered to be normative legal acts that are subject to court scrutiny, while the subject of control is their lawfulness in accordance with acts possessing higher legal force. In the article author proposes adopting a doctrinal approach to defining the object and subject of judicial control in administrative proceedings of Armenia, including a clear differentiation of these concepts in court decisions. The author emphasizes the importance of correct usage of terminology to ensure legal clarity and unambiguity in judicial rulings. In conclusion, the article presents well-founded conclusions and recommendations regarding the application of the terms "object" and "subject" of judicial control in administrative proceedings of Armenia, and underscores the necessity of maintaining unity and consistency in judicial practice to improve the efficiency of judicial procedures and protect the rights and interests of citizens and organizations in Armenia.

PDF

MILA HAYRAPETOVA

Leading specialist at legal-advisory division at the Expert-Analytical Department of the

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia,

Third year graduate student at the Armenian-Russian (Slavonic) University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-15

Annotation.

Fiction, as an effective mechanism aimed at ensuring the constitutional right of proper administration, is a serious impulse for the entire system of public administration: on the basis of an application by an individual or legal entity in the field of public law, while carrying out a state-authoritative function, it is possible to ensure the basic principles of administration, otherwise the consequence that is most desirable for the applicant will be achieved. The above should more than alert any official acting on behalf of the state and the municipality to avoid fictitious acts as much as possible, since such an act may be unlawful, but the addressee of the act, having the right to trust this act, will exercise his rights, thereby ensuring a disproportionate balance between its rights and interests of the state and municipality.

PDF

KAREN AMIRYAN

Judge of the Appellate Anti-Corruption Court of the RA,

Assistant at YSU Faculty of Law, Chair of Theory and History of

State and Law, Candidate of Law

ANNA STEPANIAN

Expert of the Anti-corruption Policy Development and Monitoring,

Department of the RA Ministry of Justice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-3

Annotation.

Within the framework of this article, the need to introduce and apply anti-corruption expertise in the RA legal system was discussed. The current situation in relation to the field was analyzed, as a result of which we proposed to define the anti-corruption examination as an independent type of examination at the law level, as well as to establish an authorizing norm by law, within the framework of which a sub-legislative normative legal act regulating the procedural issues of anti-corruption examination will be adopted. In addition, for the implementation of anti-corruption examination, we have proposed to create a separate specialized independent body, to define the scope of the legal acts and/or the criteria for their selection, which will be subject to anti-corruption examination. At the same time, in order to achieve the desired result, we proposed to create effective cooperation between the state body that will carry out anti-corruption expertise and the higher education institutions involved in that process.

PDF

Ամսագրի ամբողջական համարը

 

1․ Կարեն Ամիրյան, Աննա Ստեփանյան - «Հակակոռուպցիոն փորձաքննության՝ որպես իրավական ակտերում կոռուպցիոն ռիսկերի գնահատման մեխանիզմի՝ ՀՀ իրավական համակարգում ներդրման և կիրառման անհրաժեշտությունն ու առանձնահատկությունները»,

2. Мила Айрапетова - "Воздействие административного молчания на конституционное право человека на надлежащее администрирование",

3.  Ռաֆիկ Խանդանյան - «Ուղղակի դատական վերահսկողության «օբյեկտ» և «առարկա» եզրույթները ՀՀ վարչական դատավարությունում»,

4. Եփրեմ Կարապետյան - «Հանրային բարեվարքության հասկացությունը»,

5. Աննա Հակոբյան - «Ձեռքբերման վաղեմության ինստիտուտի սոցիալ-իրավական բովանդակությունը»,

6. Կարեն Մելիքսեթյան - «Իրավունքի չարաշահումը և կորպորացիայի պատասխանատվության առանձնահատկությունները»,

7. Մերի Խաչատրյան - «Ապօրինի ծագում ունեցող գույքի բռնագանձման պահանջի գործերով ապացուցման բեռի բաշխման առանձնահատկությունները»,

8. Արմեն Ասատրյան - «Միգրացիոն հոսքերի ընդհանուր նկարագիրը, պատճառներն ու հետևանքները, պայքարի մեխանիզմերը: Համեմատական վերլուծություն»,

9. Գևորգ Իսրայելյան - «Թմրամիջոցների, հոգեմետ (հոգեներգործուն) նյութերի, դրանց պատրաստուկների, պրեկուրսորների, խիստ ներգործող կամ թունավոր նյութերի օրինական շրջանառության դեմ ուղղված խախտումների համար պատասխանատվության իրավական հիմքերի կատարելագործման որոշ հարցեր»,

10.  Гайк Григорян - "Проблемы ответственности военно-политического руководства Азербайджана за геноцид армян Нагорного Карабаха (по принципу универсальной юрисдикции)",

11. Ադելինա Սարգսյան - «Յատրոգեն հանցավորության քրեաբանական բնութագիրը և կանխարգելումը Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում», 

12. Роза Абраамян - "Уголовная концепция дифференциации наказаний как правовой принцип",

13. Ինգա Ավագյան - «Փորձագետի եզրակացությունը՝ որպես ապացույց ՀՀ քրեական դատավարությունում»,

14. Сурен Багинян - "Основная характеристика совершения государственной измены",

15. Գոռ Հովհաննիսյան - «Եվրոպական իրավունք (մաս IV) – հիմնական ազատությունները»:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Այլ հոդվածներ …