GOHAR AVAGYAN

PhD student at the Chair of Civil Procedure at YSU Faculty of Law

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-43

Annotation.

One of the effective methods stipulated by the legislation, which ensures the implementation of judicial decisions, is by establishing a distinct mechanism for securing rights during administrative proceedings. This mechanism, referred to as “preliminary protection of rights,” operates separately from the method used to secure claims. The latter method is applicable only to three specific types of claims and does not extend to dispute claims. Notably, this study focuses on the suspension of administrative acts as a unique form of preliminary protection. It sheds light on the distinctions between this suspension and the general claim securing process. Furthermore, it underscores legislative strategies, identifies legal gaps in the current framework, and suggests legal remedies. The research explores the differences between suspending the execution of an administrative act and suspending its operation. It emphasizes the necessity of empowering courts to employ protective measures while investigating the factual context of a case, guided by terms such as “significant damage,” “reasonable doubt,” and “ impossibility of rights protection.” The interpretation of these terms forms the foundation for suspending administrative acts. The investigation delves into varying interpretations of the term “impossibility” and advocates for uniformity in its application. It also delves into instances where immediate execution of administrative acts is mandated, both as a legal requirement and as a rationale for their swift execution by administrative bodies. This analysis considers the interplay between public and private interests in these scenarios. In this pursuit, the study draws insights from international practices, as well as domestic legislative and judicial experiences. It pinpoints legal gaps and introduces potential legal remedies within this framework.

PDF

KAREN MELIKSETYAN

PhD student at YSU Civil Law Chair,

“FLASH” LLC lawyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-33

Annotation.

This scientific article is devoted to the study of some features of the executive body of the corporation as a body carrying out current management, identifying problematic issues and offering practical solutions. The status of the executive body of the corporation, features and peculiarities, varieties of the executive body (sole and collegial), the competence of the latter and other problematic issues of scientific interest were investigated. In addition, the article identified and discussed issues related to the company's current activities, normal economic activity, management issues, requirements, conditions, restrictions (incompatibility requirements), powers related to the members of the executive body and the nature of contracts concluded with the executive body. At the same time, the article reveals the essence and features of the executive body of venture joint-stock companies, among other things, the subject of discussion were the rights to manage the executive body of venture joint-stock companies, approval of the head of the executive body elected/appointed by venture investors, a special executive body and other qualities inherent in it. As a generalization of the above, it is proposed to localize the mechanisms of the executive body of venture joint-stock companies and improve the legislation of the Republic of Armenia, which will create a favorable investment environment and attract foreign investment.

PDF

ARSEN KAGHKTSYAN

Head of the Department of Social and Legal Support, Department of Military Discipline and

Social and Legal Support of the Department of Moral and Psychological Support of the Armed

Forces of the Republic of Armenia,

Lieutenant Colonel Arsen Kaghktsyan, RAU Applicant

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-24

Annotation.

The article deals with theoretical and legal issues related to the definition of the essence and content of the sources of military law of the Republic of Armenia, covering only a part of the surviving materials on the centuries-old history of the Armenian army. On the basis of a historical excursion and the genesis of military law as a science, a list of types of sources of military law of the Republic of Armenia is substantiated, including, among other things, those that were not mentioned earlier in the national legal science. Some considerations are expressed regarding the prospects for the development of military law as a science, including as a subject of dissertation research. This work is relevant for the modern science of military law, which is a significant contribution to legal science and fills the existing gap in knowledge in the field of state and military construction, military art and military law.

PDF

ADELINA SARGSYAN

PhD in Law,

Lecturer of the Department of Criminal Law and

Criminal Procedure Law,

Institute of Law and Politics of the Russian-Armenian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-13

Annotation.

This article examines the issues of current legal education through the prism of the ongoing processes of digital transformation. It is noted that legal education lags far behind digital needs and realities. In the light of the above, the author outlines the main directions for the development and improvement of legal education in order to train qualitatively new personnel, whose professional knowledge and skills will meet the current needs to the highest degree. The possibility of providing universities with appropriate highly specialized departments that train relevant personnel in the field of digital law is analyzed. The study of the experience of various universities suggests the need to revise the curricula of bachelor's and master's degrees with their subsequent adaptation to the ongoing processes of digitalization, namely, the provision of a number of disciplines related to the legal regulation of digital relations. Proposals are being made aimed at making changes to professional competencies, in particular, providing for such digital competence (subcompetence) as the ability to correctly apply the norms of substantive and procedural law in the field of digital rights of citizens.

PDF

 RAFAYEL VARDANYAN

Candidate of Law

ARMEN SHUKURYAN

Senior researcher at the Institute of Philosophy,

Sociology and Law of the NAS of the RA,

Candidate of Law

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-3


Annotation.

In this article the author has systematically analyzed the problems related to the origin and development of comparative jurisprudence in specific countries, in particular the origin and development of the idea of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world, the development of the views of comparative jurisprudence in the Middle Ages, the historical-philosophical aspects of comparative jurisprudence direction In Germany, the development of comparative jurisprudence in England and the USA, comparative jurisprudence in Russia, comparative jurisprudence in the first half of the 20th century, comparative jurisprudence in the period after World War 2, comparative jurisprudence and international scientific cooperation. The ideas of comparative jurisprudence in the ancient world were more prominently manifested in the works of the philosophers of Ancient Athens and the lawyers of Ancient Rome, according to Western scholars, it was here that not only comparative-legal ideas were formed for the first time but also, in practice for the first time, an attempt was made to subject the state and law to comparative research. In the Middle Ages, the ideas of comparative jurisprudence had a certain development based on the borrowing (reception) of Roman law, the formation and coordination of canon law, as well as national legal system (mainly) on the basis of customary law. Comparative legal studies continued throughout the Middle Ages, up to modern times, when Montesquieu, Hugo Grotius, Pufendorf, and others succeeded one another. In the new and modern period, comperative legal researches not only multiplied in therms of volume, but also took on a systematic nature and was gradually formed as an independent legal science.

PDF

Ամսագրի ամբողջական համարը

1. Ռաֆայել Վարդանյան, Արմեն Շուքուրյան - «Համեմատական իրավագիտության ծագումն ու զարգացումը (պատմական զարգացման հիմ­նական ուղենիշները)», 

2. Аделина Саргсян -  "Качественное обновление юридического образования в условиях цифровой трансформации общественных отношений",

3. Арсен Кахкцян - "Источники военного права Республики Армения",

4. Կարեն Մելիքսեթյան - «Գործադիր մարմինը՝ որպես կորպորացիայի ընթացիկ ղեկավարումն իրականացնող մարմին», 

5. Գոհար Ավագյան - «Ապահովման ինստիտուտի առանձնահատկությունները վիճարկման հայցի հիման վրա հարուցված գործերով»,

6. Гайк Григорян - "Проблемы ответственности военно-политического руководства Азербайджана за геноцид армянского населения Нагорного Карабаха",

7. Մելիք Մելիքյան - «Հանցագործության պրովոկացիայի օբյեկտիվ հատկանիշները»,

8. Գևորգ Իսրայելյան - «Թմրամիջոցների, հոգեմետ (հոգեներգործուն) նյութերի, դրանց պատրաստուկների, պրեկուրսորների, խիստ ներգործող կամ թունավոր նյութերի օրինական շրջանառության դեմ ուղղված հանցագործությունների առարկայի տեսակները և առանձնահատկությունները»,

9. Varazdat Sukiasyan - "Dialogue Between the Strasbourg Court and National Courts (Criminal Limb)",

10. Ованес Баяндурян - "Уголовно-процессуальное положение юридического лица в Республике Армения",

11. Կարապետ Սմբատյան - «Միջնորդությունները ՀՀ քրեական դատավարության նոր օրենսգրքում»,

12. Արփի Լազարյան - «Անչափահաս դատապարտյալների հետ վարվեցողության միջազգային չափորոշիչները և դրանց կիրառման որոշ հիմնախնդիրները Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում»,

13. Գոռ Հովհաննիսյան - «Եվրոպական իրավունք (մաս III) – հիմ­նական իրավունքների խարտիայի հիմ­նական իրավունքները»,

14. Роза Амирова - "Международные санкции в сфере банковских услуг по переводам денежных средств как форс-мажорное обстоятельство".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Այլ հոդվածներ …