RAFIK KHANDANYAN

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Theory of Law and Constitutional

Law of the Russian-Armenian University,

Judge of the Administrative Court of Appeal of the Republic of Armenia,

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor,

Doctoral student of the Russian-Armenian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-26

Annotation.

The author conducts a comprehensive analysis of judicial practice and doctrinal approaches to defining the concepts of "object" and "subject" of judicial control in the administrative proceedings of the Republic of Armenia. The article highlights the problems and ambiguities in the use of these terms by the courts of Armenia and proposes ways to clarify and unify them to ensure consistency and clarity in judicial decisions. The author identifies two main groups of approaches to distinguishing the object and subject of judicial control in relation to normative legal acts in administrative proceedings. According to the first group, the object and subject of judicial control are considered equivalent concepts, but the preference is given to the formulation "subject of judicial control." The second group of authors seeks to clearly differentiate these concepts, where the object of control is considered to be normative legal acts that are subject to court scrutiny, while the subject of control is their lawfulness in accordance with acts possessing higher legal force. In the article author proposes adopting a doctrinal approach to defining the object and subject of judicial control in administrative proceedings of Armenia, including a clear differentiation of these concepts in court decisions. The author emphasizes the importance of correct usage of terminology to ensure legal clarity and unambiguity in judicial rulings. In conclusion, the article presents well-founded conclusions and recommendations regarding the application of the terms "object" and "subject" of judicial control in administrative proceedings of Armenia, and underscores the necessity of maintaining unity and consistency in judicial practice to improve the efficiency of judicial procedures and protect the rights and interests of citizens and organizations in Armenia.

PDF

MILA HAYRAPETOVA

Leading specialist at legal-advisory division at the Expert-Analytical Department of the

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia,

Third year graduate student at the Armenian-Russian (Slavonic) University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-15

Annotation.

Fiction, as an effective mechanism aimed at ensuring the constitutional right of proper administration, is a serious impulse for the entire system of public administration: on the basis of an application by an individual or legal entity in the field of public law, while carrying out a state-authoritative function, it is possible to ensure the basic principles of administration, otherwise the consequence that is most desirable for the applicant will be achieved. The above should more than alert any official acting on behalf of the state and the municipality to avoid fictitious acts as much as possible, since such an act may be unlawful, but the addressee of the act, having the right to trust this act, will exercise his rights, thereby ensuring a disproportionate balance between its rights and interests of the state and municipality.

PDF

KAREN AMIRYAN

Judge of the Appellate Anti-Corruption Court of the RA,

Assistant at YSU Faculty of Law, Chair of Theory and History of

State and Law, Candidate of Law

ANNA STEPANIAN

Expert of the Anti-corruption Policy Development and Monitoring,

Department of the RA Ministry of Justice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.10-12-3

Annotation.

Within the framework of this article, the need to introduce and apply anti-corruption expertise in the RA legal system was discussed. The current situation in relation to the field was analyzed, as a result of which we proposed to define the anti-corruption examination as an independent type of examination at the law level, as well as to establish an authorizing norm by law, within the framework of which a sub-legislative normative legal act regulating the procedural issues of anti-corruption examination will be adopted. In addition, for the implementation of anti-corruption examination, we have proposed to create a separate specialized independent body, to define the scope of the legal acts and/or the criteria for their selection, which will be subject to anti-corruption examination. At the same time, in order to achieve the desired result, we proposed to create effective cooperation between the state body that will carry out anti-corruption expertise and the higher education institutions involved in that process.

PDF

Ամսագրի ամբողջական համարը

 

1․ Կարեն Ամիրյան, Աննա Ստեփանյան - «Հակակոռուպցիոն փորձաքննության՝ որպես իրավական ակտերում կոռուպցիոն ռիսկերի գնահատման մեխանիզմի՝ ՀՀ իրավական համակարգում ներդրման և կիրառման անհրաժեշտությունն ու առանձնահատկությունները»,

2. Мила Айрапетова - "Воздействие административного молчания на конституционное право человека на надлежащее администрирование",

3.  Ռաֆիկ Խանդանյան - «Ուղղակի դատական վերահսկողության «օբյեկտ» և «առարկա» եզրույթները ՀՀ վարչական դատավարությունում»,

4. Եփրեմ Կարապետյան - «Հանրային բարեվարքության հասկացությունը»,

5. Աննա Հակոբյան - «Ձեռքբերման վաղեմության ինստիտուտի սոցիալ-իրավական բովանդակությունը»,

6. Կարեն Մելիքսեթյան - «Իրավունքի չարաշահումը և կորպորացիայի պատասխանատվության առանձնահատկությունները»,

7. Մերի Խաչատրյան - «Ապօրինի ծագում ունեցող գույքի բռնագանձման պահանջի գործերով ապացուցման բեռի բաշխման առանձնահատկությունները»,

8. Արմեն Ասատրյան - «Միգրացիոն հոսքերի ընդհանուր նկարագիրը, պատճառներն ու հետևանքները, պայքարի մեխանիզմերը: Համեմատական վերլուծություն»,

9. Գևորգ Իսրայելյան - «Թմրամիջոցների, հոգեմետ (հոգեներգործուն) նյութերի, դրանց պատրաստուկների, պրեկուրսորների, խիստ ներգործող կամ թունավոր նյութերի օրինական շրջանառության դեմ ուղղված խախտումների համար պատասխանատվության իրավական հիմքերի կատարելագործման որոշ հարցեր»,

10.  Гайк Григорян - "Проблемы ответственности военно-политического руководства Азербайджана за геноцид армян Нагорного Карабаха (по принципу универсальной юрисдикции)",

11. Ադելինա Սարգսյան - «Յատրոգեն հանցավորության քրեաբանական բնութագիրը և կանխարգելումը Հայաստանի Հանրապետությունում», 

12. Роза Абраамян - "Уголовная концепция дифференциации наказаний как правовой принцип",

13. Ինգա Ավագյան - «Փորձագետի եզրակացությունը՝ որպես ապացույց ՀՀ քրեական դատավարությունում»,

14. Сурен Багинян - "Основная характеристика совершения государственной измены",

15. Գոռ Հովհաննիսյան - «Եվրոպական իրավունք (մաս IV) – հիմնական ազատությունները»:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROZA AMIROVA

3nd year PhD student at Russian-Armenian University,

lawyer at the Financial System Mediator office

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-135

Annotation.

International sanctions are restrictive measures of an economic or political nature that are imposed by states or authorized bodies of international organizations against certain countries, organizations, and individuals. The article contains a theoretical and practical analysis of some issues related to the force majeure criteria. Much more attention is paid to the current judicial practice of recognizing foreign sanctions as force majeure, also were raised the issues of releasing banks from liability in the presence of sanctions restrictions on the sphere of banking services related to money transfers. During the period when foreign countries apply large-scale sanctions against the Russian Federation, there are widespread situations when the signed agreements are impossible or difficult to implement. Since sanctions have become the new economic reality, participants of civil circulation try to shift their risks onto partners or banks when conflict situations arise. We think that, most likely, in the future, judicial practice will recognize sanctions as force majeure. In the conditions of the instability of the economic situation, when signing a contract, it is also necessary to describe the circumstances that parties will later consider as force majeure.

PDF

GOR HOVHANNISYAN

Associate Professor at the Chair of German and European Constitutional and

Administrative Law, as well as International Law at the University of Hagen,

Attorney-at-law, Мember of the Saxon Bar Association,

Doctor of Laws (Berlin), Master of Administrative Sciences (Speyer)

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59546/18290744-2023.4-9-123

Annotation.

The first part of the four-part series of articles on European law starts with basic questions and the foundations of organisational law. The second part explains the legal sources of the European Union law and also deals with the legislative procedures. In addition, the structural principles applicable in the European law are outlined. The third part focuses on the fundamental rights of the European Union, which - in addition to the fundamental freedoms - are the essential individual rights of European primary law. The structural peculiarities from the perspective of the european and constitutional law are described, with a particular focus on the binding effect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights for the Member States. The fourth part explains the fundamental freedoms as the central means for establishing the internal market.

PDF

Այլ հոդվածներ …